Theres a difference between knowing how to do, vs, how to look for the reason to do something...
Eye trackers, high-fidelity scenarios, and biometrics - those were some interesting days! We just wrapped up a two-day force-on-force workshop at Project Gecko HQ. The opposed ITCQB workshop is part of data based approach designed to conceptualize and optimize the use of force-on-force training.
We find running FOF trainings rather interesting, but also demanding. See, Developing an engaging training scenario can be a challenging task. Instructors typically follow a traditional approach, analyzing a task to identify the necessary skills and characteristics for successful performance. This approach should be rooted in the training curriculum, which includes preparatory information, skills, abilities, and other components tested to assess whether students can transfer what they've learned effectively.
However, instructors should strive to develop a unique approach where the event itself serves as the curriculum, resulting in a more significant impact on performance and decision-making.
An event-based training scenario involves a task-specific procedure, such as a warrant or a barricaded situation. It should provide students with corresponding performance conditions like environmental, internal, and team task demands. However, many instructors fail to structure scenarios effectively, leading to force-on-force training turning into a paintball match.
In other words, to make force-on-force training beneficial, a structured approach must be taken, considering the student, context, and desired outcomes. This approach ensures training the right thing, in the right way, with the right tools.
Pictures from our last Force on Force workshop. Next FOF workshop is almost booked out, and scheduled for this upcoming june.
See you there!